Mechanical Dysfunction of the Left Atrium and the Left Atrial Appendage Following Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation and Its Relation to Total Electrical Energy Used for Cardioversion
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 81 (9) , 1125-1129
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00141-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Variables Affecting Recovery of Left Atrial Mechanical Function After Cardioversion From Atrial FibrillationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Transesophageal Echocardiographic Evaluation of Left Atrial Appendage Function and Spontaneous Contrast Formation After Chemical or Electrical Cardioversion of Atrial FibrillationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Temporal dependence of the return of atrial mechanical function on the mode of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythmThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Transesophageal echocardiography before and during direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Evidence for “atrial stunning” as a mechanism of thromboembolic complicationsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Impact of electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation on left atrial appendage function and spontaneous echo contrast: Characterization by simultaneous transesophageal echocardiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Pulsed Doppler evaluation of atrial mechanical function after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Left atrial function after electrical conversion to sinus rhythm.Heart, 1968
- LEFT ATRIAL ACTIVITY FOLLOWING CARDIOVERSIONThe Lancet, 1965
- Circulatory Consequences of Changes in Cardiac Rhythm Produced in Patients by Transthoracic Direct-Current Shock*Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1964
- Introduction with comments on the hemodynamic significance of atrial systoleThe American Journal of Medicine, 1964