Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution or Social Construction?
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cross-Cultural Research
- Vol. 30 (1) , 24-59
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719603000102
Abstract
Buss, Larsen, Westen, and Semmelroth claimed that sex differences in the dislike of sexual or emotional infidelity supported the socio-biological hypothesis of men (i.e., most men) having evolved sexual jealousy, whereas women (i.e., most women) evolved emotional jealousy. In two studies with 745 undergraduates, our finding was that, similar to the Buss et al. finding, over 50% of the men and women reported greater upset over imagined emotional infidelity. Subjects responded to a self-rating of jealousy, the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, 39 items articulating gender norms, a request to explain their dislike of infidelity, and which of 8 excuses by the wayward partner was most upsetting. We proposed that the findings could be explained more parsimoniously by the concept of the social construc tion of gender and Eagly's social-role perspective.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Masculinity Ideology: Its Impact on Adolescent Males' Heterosexual RelationshipsJournal of Social Issues, 1993
- Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and PsychologyPsychological Science, 1992
- The Cultural Contribution To Jealousy: Cross-Cultural Aggression in Sexual Jealousy SituationsBehavior Science Research, 1990
- Cross-cultural patterns in the training of children: An evolutionary perspective.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1989
- The social constructionist movement in modern psychology.American Psychologist, 1985
- Male sexual jealousyEthology and Sociobiology, 1982
- Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing.Psychological Review, 1981
- A CONSTRUCTIVIST VIEW OF EMOTIONPublished by Elsevier ,1980
- Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975