INFLUENCE OF GENOTYPE, WATER AND N ON LEAF WATER RELATIONS IN NO-TILL WINTER WHEAT
- 1 April 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Plant Science
- Vol. 70 (2) , 431-441
- https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps90-051
Abstract
Field studies were established at four locations in 1985 and 1986 to study the physiological responses of two winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars under different water and nitrogen regimes. Measurements of leaf water potential (ψ1), osmotic potential (π) and leaf conductance (g1) were made on individual leaves at regular intervals throughout the growing season. Values of ψ1 ranged from −1.0 to −4.5 MPa, indicating that winter wheat in Saskatchewan experiences moderate to extreme levels of water stress. Leaf ψ1 levels generally decreased as evaporative demand for water increased. Osmotic potential values ranged from −1.0 to −4.0 MPa while ψp (calculated as ψp = ψ1 − π) ranged from −0.4 to 0.9 MPa. Despite strong osmotic adjustment in response to stress, positive ψp was not always maintained. Additional water through limited irrigation increased both ψ1 and π but did not significantly affect ψp. Fertilizer N additions consistently decreased both ψ1, and π, and in some cases ψp levels. The tall cultivar Norstar displayed greater turgor maintenance than the semidwarf cultivar Norwin under both stress and nonstress conditions. Leaf conductance ranged from approximately 0.04 – 1.10 cm s−1 and was higher in irrigated plots. Fertilizer N additions often decreased g1 per unit area of leaf. On a leaf area basis, g1 for Norwin at high N levels was often greater than for Norstar. However, similar g1 vs. ψ1 responses for Norwin and Norstar indicated a similar stomatal response to increased water stress for these cultivars.Key words: Drought stress, nitrogen, leaf conductance, turgor potentialThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of water stress with phasic development on yield of wheat grown in a semi-arid environmentField Crops Research, 1982
- INFLUENCE OF SOIL WATER STRESS ON WILTING AND WATER RELATIONS OF DIFFERENTLY OSMOTICALLY ADJUSTED WHEAT PLANTSNew Phytologist, 1981
- Drought Response of Winter Wheat Cultivars Grown under Field Stress Conditions1Crop Science, 1981
- Photosynthesis of Grass Species Differing in Carbon Dioxide Fixation PathwaysPlant Physiology, 1980
- Evaluation of winter wheat cultivars for drought resistanceEuphytica, 1980
- A Comparison of Osmotic Potential, Elastic Modulus, and Apoplastic Water in Leaves of Dryland Winter Wheat1Agronomy Journal, 1978
- Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responsesAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1978
- Aspects of the water relations of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to induced droughtThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1977
- Changes in Diffusive Conductance and Water Potential of Wheat Plants Before and After AnthesisFunctional Plant Biology, 1977
- Soil water relations and relative turgidity on leaves in the wheat cropAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1966