Comparison of conventional microparticulate and a monolithic reversed-phase column for high-efficiency fast liquid chromatography of basic compounds
- 8 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Chromatography A
- Vol. 965 (1-2) , 51-64
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(01)01584-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Repeatability and reproducibility of retention data and band profiles on reversed-phase liquid chromatography columns: IV. Results obtained with Luna C18 (2) columnsJournal of Chromatography A, 2000
- Peak tailing and mass transfer kinetics in linear chromatographyJournal of Chromatography A, 1999
- Comparative study on the column performance of microparticulate 5-μm C18-bonded and monolithic C18-bonded reversed-phase columns in high-performance liquid chromatographyJournal of Chromatography A, 1999
- Evaluation procedures for reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic columns in the analysis of strongly basic compounds using principal components analysis for data assessmentThe Analyst, 1998
- The silanol group and its role in liquid chromatographyJournal of Chromatography A, 1997
- Comparative evaluation of bonded-silica reversed-phase columns for high-performance liquid chromatography using strongly basic compounds and alternative organic modifiers buffered at acid pHJournal of Chromatography A, 1997
- Stability of silica-based, endcapped columns with pH 7 and 11 mobile phases for reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographyJournal of Chromatography A, 1997
- Temperature‐programmed microcolumn liquid chromatography/mass spectrometryJournal of Microcolumn Separations, 1992
- On the Use of the Knox Equation. II. the Efficiency Measurement ProblemJournal of Liquid Chromatography, 1989
- Equations for calculation of chromatographic figures of merit for ideal and skewed peaksAnalytical Chemistry, 1983