Right Heart Catheterization and Cardiac Complications in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery
- 18 July 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 286 (3) , 309-314
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.3.309
Abstract
Context Right heart catheterization (RHC) is commonly performed before high-risk noncardiac surgery, but the benefit of this strategy remains unproven. Objective To evaluate the relationship between use of perioperative RHC and postoperative cardiac complication rates in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Design Prospective, observational cohort study. Setting Tertiary care teaching hospital in the United States. Patients Patients (n = 4059 aged ≥50 years) who underwent major elective noncardiac procedures with an expected length of stay of 2 or more days between July 18, 1989, and February 28, 1994. Two hundred twenty one patients had RHC and 3838 did not. Main Outcome Measure Combined end point of major postoperative cardiac events, including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, ventricular fibrillation, documented ventricular tachycardia or primary cardiac arrest, and sustained complete heart block, classified by a reviewer blinded to preoperative data. Results Major cardiac events occurred in 171 patients (4.2%). Patients who underwent perioperative RHC had a 3-fold increase in incidence of major postoperative cardiac events (34 [15.4%] vs 137 [3.6%]; P<.001). In multivariate analyses, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for postoperative major cardiac and noncardiac events in patients undergoing RHC were 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-3.2) and 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2-3.5), respectively. In a case-control analysis of a subset of 215 matched pairs of patients who did and did not undergo RHC, adjusted for propensity of RHC and type of procedure, patients who underwent perioperative RHC also had increased risk of postoperative congestive heart failure (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-6.2) and major noncardiac events (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4-4.9). Conclusions No evidence was found of reduction in complication rates associated with use of perioperative RHC in this population. Because of the morbidity and the high costs associated with RHC, the impact of this intervention in perioperative care should be evaluated in randomized trials.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Derivation and Prospective Validation of a Simple Index for Prediction of Cardiac Risk of Major Noncardiac SurgeryCirculation, 1999
- Preoperative Assessment of Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Pulmonary artery catheterization. Can there be an integrated strategy for guideline development and research promotion?JAMA, 1993
- Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment for Patients Having Peripheral Vascular SurgeryAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- The Preoperative and Intraoperative Hemodynamic Predictors of Postoperative Myocardial Infarction or Ischemia in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 1989
- Prospective Trial of Supranormal Values of Survivors as Therapeutic Goals in High-Risk Surgical PatientsChest, 1988
- Hemodynamic and oxygen transport patterns in surviving and nonsurviving postoperative patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1985
- Fatal myocardial infarction following peripheral vascular operations: A study of 951 patients followed 6 to 11 years postoperativelyCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale.Circulation, 1981
- Multifactorial Index of Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgical ProceduresNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977