Intrathecal baclofen: does tolerance occur?
- 1 August 1993
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Spinal Cord
- Vol. 31 (8) , 516-520
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1993.84
Abstract
Concern over the development of tolerance in patients on continuous intrathecal baclofen therapy has arisen as this new form of treatment for spasticity has gained wider use. We have studied time-dose relationships in 18 spinal cord injured patients who have undergone intrathecal baclofen infusion pump implantation since February 1988 in our facility. Our data show that there was a significant increase in baclofen dosage needed to control spasticity during the first 12 months post implantation. After 12 months, however, no significant change in dosage requirement was detected. In addition, there was no significant difference between completely and incompletely spinal cord injured patients with regard to both the initial dose and the tolerance trend.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONTINUOUS INTRATHECAL BACLOFEN IN SPINAL CORD SPASTICITYAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1992
- Intraspinal baclofen in the treatment of severe spasticity and spasmsActa Neurochirurgica, 1991
- Continuous infusion of intrathecal baclofen: long-term effects on spasticity in spinal cord injurySpinal Cord, 1991
- Chronic Intrathecal Baclofen Administration in Severe SpasticityStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 1990
- Chronic intrathecal baclofen administration for control of severe spasticityJournal of Neurosurgery, 1990
- Intrathecal baclofen for long-term treatment of spasticity: a multi-centre study.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1989
- Intrathecal Baclofen for Severe Spinal SpasticityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Long-term intrathecal baclofen infusion for treatment of spasticityJournal of Neurosurgery, 1987
- INTRATHECAL BACLOFEN ALLEVIATES SPINAL CORD SPASTICITYThe Lancet, 1984
- Are baclofen-sensitive GABAB receptors present on primary afferent terminals of the spinal cord?Nature, 1984