Meta-Analysis: Exercise Therapy for Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Top Cited Papers
- 3 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 142 (9) , 765-775
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-9-200505030-00013
Abstract
Exercise therapy is widely used as an intervention in low back pain. To evaluate the effectiveness of exercise therapy in adult nonspecific acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain versus no treatment and other conservative treatments. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases to October 2004; citation searches and bibliographic reviews of previous systematic reviews. Randomized, controlled trials evaluating exercise therapy for adult nonspecific low back pain and measuring pain, function, return to work or absenteeism, and global improvement outcomes. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on study characteristics, quality, and outcomes at short-, intermediate-, and long-term follow-up. 61 randomized, controlled trials (6390 participants) met inclusion criteria: acute (11 trials), subacute (6 trials), and chronic (43 trials) low back pain (1 trial was unclear). Evidence suggests that exercise therapy is effective in chronic back pain relative to comparisons at all follow-up periods. Pooled mean improvement (of 100 points) was 7.3 points (95% CI, 3.7 to 10.9 points) for pain and 2.5 points (CI, 1.0 to 3.9 points) for function at earliest follow-up. In studies investigating patients (people seeking care for back pain), mean improvement was 13.3 points (CI, 5.5 to 21.1 points) for pain and 6.9 points (CI, 2.2 to 11.7 points) for function, compared with studies where some participants had been recruited from a general population (for example, with advertisements). Some evidence suggests effectiveness of a graded-activity exercise program in subacute low back pain in occupational settings, although the evidence for other types of exercise therapy in other populations is inconsistent. In acute low back pain, exercise therapy and other programs were equally effective (pain, 0.03 point [CI, −1.3 to 1.4 points]). Limitations of the literature, including low-quality studies with heterogeneous outcome measures inconsistent and poor reporting, and possibility of publication bias. Exercise therapy seems to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic low back pain, particularly in health care populations. In subacute low back pain populations, some evidence suggests that a graded-activity program improves absenteeism outcomes, although evidence for other types of exercise is unclear. In acute low back pain populations, exercise therapy is as effective as either no treatment or other conservative treatments.Keywords
This publication has 80 references indexed in Scilit:
- Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scaleEuropean journal of pain, 2004
- Exercise reduces sick leave in patients with non-acute non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysisJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2004
- Exercise and chronic low back pain: what works?Pain, 2004
- The Alexander Technique: A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical TrialsComplementary Medicine Research, 2003
- Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review GroupSpine, 2003
- Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Assessing Global Pain Severity by Self-Report in Clinical and Health Services ResearchSpine, 2000
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testBMJ, 1997
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996