What are the barriers to offering HIV testing in an antenatal setting? A national study of obstetricians
- 31 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 21 (12) , 1601-1606
- https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0b013e32823ecf45
Abstract
To investigate factors that influence the antenatal screening practice of obstetricians and identify barriers to the implementation of universal antenatal HIV screening. A survey of all obstetricians registered with the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. A questionnaire was mailed to all obstetricians in Australia, followed by two reminders. The overall response rate was 70% (817/1172) and of these 70% always offered an HIV test during pregnancy. Obstetricians offering the test were more likely to female or younger in age. Of respondents who always offered testing, 90% disagreed with only testing women with risk factors compared with only 34% of those who undertook a selective screening approach (adjusted odds ratio, 87.7; 95% confidence interval, 40-192; P = 0.001). Obstetricians who practiced selective screening were influenced by whether the woman had antenatal blood tests prior to her obstetric appointment or a previous negative HIV test. Obstetricians who practiced universal screening were more likely to be concerned about false-positive results. Many obstetricians, irrespective of their screening practice, agreed that many of the components of pretest counseling were inappropriate for the majority of women. A majority of obstetricians in Australia are offering all pregnant women an HIV test. Consideration should be given to tailoring pretest counseling requirements to the antenatal setting. Ongoing education regarding the limitations of selective screening and management of women with false-positive results is also highlighted by this study.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of an education campaign on management in pregnancy of women infected with a blood‐borne virusThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2006
- Would Universal Antenatal Screening for HIV Infection Be Cost‐Effective in a Setting of Very Low Prevalence? Modelling the Data for AustraliaThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Prenatal HIV Screening in a Tertiary Care CentreCanadian Journal of Public Health, 2001
- Uptake and acceptability of antenatal HIV testing: randomised controlled trial of different methods of offering the testBMJ, 1998
- Heterosexually Transmitted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection among Pregnant Women in a Rural Florida CommunityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Incidence and prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection in a prenatal population undergoing routine voluntary human immunodeficiency virus screening, July 1987 to June 1990American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
- Targeted HIV screening at a Los Angeles prenatal/family planning health center.American Journal of Public Health, 1991
- Routine prenatal screening for HIV infectionThe Lancet, 1991
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Women Attending an Inner-City Prenatal ClinicSexually Transmitted Diseases, 1990
- Serosurvey of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in ParturientsJAMA, 1987