Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Infection and Immunity
- Vol. 80 (3) , 891-896
- https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.06183-11
Abstract
Contemporary science has brought about technological advances and an unprecedented understanding of the natural world. However, there are signs of dysfunction in the scientific community as well as threats from diverse antiscience and political forces. Incentives in the current system place scientists under tremendous stress, discourage cooperation, encourage poor scientific practices, and deter new talent from entering the field. It is time for a discussion of how the scientific enterprise can be reformed to become more effective and robust. Serious reform will require more consistent methodological rigor and a transformation of the current hypercompetitive scientific culture.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reforming Science: Structural ReformsInfection and Immunity, 2012
- Retracted Science and the Retraction IndexInfection and Immunity, 2011
- Retraction—Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in childrenThe Lancet, 2010
- Mechanistic ScienceInfection and Immunity, 2009
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey DataPLOS ONE, 2009
- A historical reflection on the discovery of human retrovirusesRetrovirology, 2009
- A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global PopulationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Descriptive ScienceInfection and Immunity, 2008
- Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal EcosystemsPLOS ONE, 2006
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005