Comparison of Adjuvants for an Inactivated Infectious Coryza Vaccine
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JSTOR in Avian Diseases
- Vol. 31 (1) , 59-63
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1590773
Abstract
Differently formulated inactivated infectious coryza vaccines were administered to 6-week-old chickens as a single dose of 108 colony-forming units of Haemophilus paragalliarum HP31. After 3 weeks, all chickens were challenged by intrasinus inoculation of HP31. Two vaccines, one containing an aluminum-hydroxide adjuvant and the other a combined aluminum-hydroxide + mineral-oil adjuvant, gave the best protection (means of 80% and 90%, respectively). Two vaccines that contained mineral oil as the sole adjuvant gave less protection (50% and 35%). The Quil A vaccine gave no significant protection. Granulomatous swellings developed at the site of injection in birds given mineral-oil adjuvant but not in those that received other adjuvants.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of inactivated Newcastle disease viral vaccines containing different emulsion adjuvantsAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research, 1983
- Comparison of Three Experimental Inactivated Oil-Emulsion Newcastle Disease VaccinesAvian Diseases, 1981
- Comparison of alum-absorbed or non-alum-absorbed oil emulsion vaccines containing either pilate or non-pilate Bacteroides nodosus cells in inducing and maintaining resistance of sheep to experimental foot rotResearch in Veterinary Science, 1981
- Haemophilus Infections in Chickens. IV. Results of Laboratory and Field Trials of Formalinized Bacterins for the Prevention of Disease Caused by Haemophilus gallinarumAvian Diseases, 1963