Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
- Vol. 3 (11) , 859-870
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm951
Abstract
Replication forks encounter problems due to causes such as chemical damage to the DNA template, from both endogenous and exogenous agents, and problems with the protein–DNA complexes that are associated with normal metabolism, such as transcribing RNA polymerases. The structure of the DNA at a damaged fork, and whether the replication proteins remain associated with the fork, might depend on whether the initial blockage affects only a single strand of the template or both strands. Replication forks might simply pause at transient protein roadblocks that are not associated with damage in the template DNA, whereas chemical damage to the template might present a far greater problem. Specialized DNA polymerases that can replicate past damaged nucleotides might bypass the lesion, but at the cost of enhanced mutation rates. However, recombination between the two newly replicated portions of the chromosome might provide an error-free way to facilitate repair or bypass of the lesion. Recombination enzymes in bacteria might facilitate the repair of damaged forks through the unwinding of the DNA at the fork to create a four-stranded Holliday junction structure. Processing of the Holliday junction, either with or without cleavage of the junction DNA, might generate a suitable DNA structure onto which replication enzymes can be reloaded. Eukaryotes might have analogous systems to deal with blocked replication forks. Potential roles in the maintenance of replication fork progression are supported by the enhanced genome instability of humans who carry mutations in those enzymes that might unwind forked DNA structures. When the original source of a replication blockage is removed or bypassed, the replication machinery must be reassembled onto the forked DNA that has been generated by recombination. In bacteria, this is achieved by a protein that recognizes specific branched-DNA structures, and recruits essential components of the replication machinery to these structures. Eukaryotes might also have the means to reassemble replication enzymes onto recombination intermediates. The complexity of replication and repair processes indicates that some coordination must occur. Specific sites of replication in the cell, and the association of recombination enzymes with these sites, supports this idea. Recent evidence pointing to the importance of recombination for successful genome duplication indicates that recombination enzymes might be viewed as accessory factors for replication. The generation of genetic diversity — the textbook view of recombination — might, therefore, be a mere side-show that arose by hijacking of replication repair enzymes during evolution.Keywords
This publication has 125 references indexed in Scilit:
- Checking That Replication Breakdown Is Not TerminalScience, 2002
- Direct Rescue of Stalled DNA Replication Forks via the Combined Action of PriA and RecG Helicase ActivitiesMolecular Cell, 2002
- Action of RuvAB at Replication Fork StructuresPublished by Elsevier ,2001
- Positive selection of a gene family during the emergence of humans and African apesNature, 2001
- RAD51-independent break-induced replication to repair a broken chromosome depends on a distant enhancer siteGenes & Development, 2001
- Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymeraseThe EMBO Journal, 1999
- Binding specificity determines polarity of DNA unwinding by the Sgs1 protein of S. cerevisiaeJournal of Molecular Biology, 1999
- Transcription‐induced deletions in Escherichia coli plasmidsMolecular Microbiology, 1995
- Mechanism of E. coli RecA protein directed strand exchanges in post-replication repair of DNANature, 1981
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle mutant cdc9 is defective in DNA ligaseNature, 1978