Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland: Comment
- 5 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Vol. 51 (1) , 122-128
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01213.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in ScotlandJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1998
- Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent ValuationAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1998
- Semi-nonparametric estimation of binary response models with an application to natural resource valuationJournal of Econometrics, 1997
- Semiparametric Estimation of the Binary Choice Model for Contingent ValuationLand Economics, 1996
- A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuationEcological Economics, 1996
- The Implications of Model Specification for Welfare Estimation in Nested Logit ModelsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1996
- Statistical Approaches to the Fat Tail Problem for Dichotomous Choice Contingent ValuationLand Economics, 1995
- Measuring the Difference (X — Y) of Simulated Distributions: A Convolutions ApproachAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1994
- A Smoothed Maximum Score Estimator for the Binary Response ModelEconometrica, 1992
- Maximum score estimation of the stochastic utility model of choiceJournal of Econometrics, 1975