Rhetoric, civility, and community: Political debate on computer bulletin boards
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Quarterly
- Vol. 44 (3) , 359-378
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379609370023
Abstract
Does political debate on the Internet contribute to the development of civility, a democratic community, and the public sphere? Examination of debate on Usenet/Netnews bulletin boards on the Internet provides a mixed reply. On the one hand, debates are often characterized by aggressiveness, certainty, angry assertion, insult, ideological abstraction, and the attempt to humiliate opponents. On the other hand, the debates might, even admitting these faults, be characterized as displaying a high degree of formal regularity, as robust exercises in free speech, as closely attentive (if unsympathetic) to opposing arguments, as performing virtuosity in argument and language, and as a rare opportunity for free participation in a political forum where one may meet widely divergent views.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The firm, the park and the university: Fear and trembling on the postmodern trailQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1995
- Computer networks and political participation: Santa Monica's teledemocracy projectJournal of Applied Communication Research, 1995
- The public electronic network (PEN) and the homeless in Santa MonicaJournal of Applied Communication Research, 1995
- Norms of Rhetorical CulturePublished by JSTOR ,1993
- Features of the public sphereCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1987
- Intellectuals, the 'information society' and the disappearance of the public sphereMedia, Culture & Society, 1982
- On viewing rhetoric as epistemic: Ten years laterCentral States Speech Journal, 1976
- Rhetoric and autobiography: The case of Malcolm XQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1974
- The rhetoric of confrontationQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1969
- On viewing rhetoric as epistemicCentral States Speech Journal, 1967