Analytic Reviews: Considerations in the Development of Intensive Care Unit Report Cards
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 17 (5) , 211-217
- https://doi.org/10.1177/088506602237105
Abstract
Concerns over health care quality have prompted calls for the public release of performance data, or “report cards,” as one strategy for improving quality. Any initiative to create a report card should start with the selection of valid quality indicators. This is complicated by the need to account for variations in case mix among intensive care units (ICUs), the difficulty in defining which patients are receiving critical care, and the fact that pre-ICU and post-ICU care can influence the outcomes of care for ICU patients. The difficulties in measuring quality accurately make some providers reluctant to release performance data to the public, but advocates of public disclosure point to examples of improved quality after publication of report cards. Consumer and purchaser demand for report cards continues to increase, so public reporting of performance data likely will become more common. In light of this trend, it is important for physicians to become involved in the development of report cards to ensure that quality measurement is valid and that the data are used for quality improvement.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a Consumer-Oriented Internet Health Care Report CardJAMA, 2002
- Sickness Impact Profile Score versus a Modified Short-Form Survey for Functional Outcome Assessment: Acceptability, Reliability, and Validity in Critically Ill Patients with Prolonged Intensive Care Unit StaysPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
- Community-Wide Assessment of Intensive Care Outcomes Using a Physiologically Based Prognostic MeasureChest, 1999
- The Urgent Need to Improve Health Care QualityInstitute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care QualityJAMA, 1998
- Understanding articles comparing outcomes among intensive care units to rate quality of careCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Modeling the Severity of Illness of ICU PatientsJAMA, 1994
- A New Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) Based on a European/North American Multicenter StudyJAMA, 1993
- The APACHE III Prognostic SystemChest, 1991
- National estimates of intensive care utilization and costsCritical Care Medicine, 1990
- The Quality of CareJAMA, 1988