Significance of single‐subject studies (and repeated‐measures designs)
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Psychologist
- Vol. 17 (1) , 54-60
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528209529243
Abstract
A case is made for repeated‐measures experiments, and particularly single‐subject designs, over randomized group studies. The former are argued to be more powerful than the latter, in that they take advantage of psychological “context” or “contrast” effects. Moreover, they provide functional relationships that best answer the kinds of research questions in which educational researchers are interested. Finally, they require the development of experimental, rather than statistical, control — an advantage that should help the field advance.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A case against the single?sample repeated?measures experimentEducational Psychologist, 1982
- Design and analysis of experiments contrasting the within- and between-subjects manipulation of the independent variable.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use?Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- Reply to Poulton.Psychological Bulletin, 1974
- Locus of control and learned helplessness.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974
- METHODOLOGICAL AND ASSESSMENT CONSIDERATIONS IN EVALUATING REINFORCEMENT PROGRAMS IN APPLIED SETTINGS1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973
- Unwanted range effects from using within-subject experimental designs.Psychological Bulletin, 1973
- The contextual basis of behavior.American Psychologist, 1968
- Stimulus intensity effects depend upon the type of experimental design.Psychological Review, 1964
- A contrast effect in differential conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961