Selection bias in clinical trails of anaplastic glioma
- 8 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of Neurology
- Vol. 26 (4) , 531-534
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410260406
Abstract
We report a retrospective analysis of survival, and attrition to a study, of patients with anaplastic glioma seen at a regional cancer center during its participation in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Median length of survival for all patients was 35 weeks. Median length of survival for study patients was 60 weeks. Study patients were not representative of all patients; they were younger and less disabled than the nonstudy patients. Survival predictions for patients with anaplastic glioma based on the results of clinical trials may be overly optimistic. Many trials study a nonrepresentative subset of patients with anaplastic glioma, excluding those who do poorly at the outset and those who have poor function.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confounding Factors in Clinical Studies of GliomasAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1987
- Illusion and reality: practical pitfalls in interpreting clinical trials.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984
- An Additional Basic Science for Clinical Medicine: II. The Limitations of Randomized TrialsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983
- Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and CCNU versus radiotherapy, CCNU plus procarbazine for the treatment of malignant gliomas following surgeryJournal of Neuro-Oncology, 1983
- Cancer patient accessions into clinical trials A pilot investigation into some patient and physician determinants of entryAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1982
- Evaluation of CCNU, VM-26 plus CCNU, and procarbazine in supratentorial brain gliomasJournal of Neurosurgery, 1981
- Epidemiologic Study of Primary Intracranial NeoplasmsArchives of Neurology, 1981
- Randomized Comparisons of Radiotherapy and Nitrosoureas for the Treatment of Malignant Glioma after SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDIES IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT?The Lancet, 1979