Minimal-Access Variations in Abdominoplasty

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The use of liposuction began a trend toward less invasive abdominal contour surgery and resulted in a variety of techniques based on individual anatomy. An analysis of 170 patients was undertaken to determine which patients benefited from even less invasive techniques that evolved from these concepts. The selection criteria used were based on the physical examination of the skin, fat and muscle layers, and patients' goals, willingness to accept incisions, and tolerance for the recovery period. The options used for this new category of treatment were subtypes of the abdominolipoplasty system (type 1, suction-assisted lipectomy; type 2, miniabdominoplasty; type 3, modified abdominoplasty; type 4, full abdominoplasty) and included extended liposuction (type 1a); “open” miniabdominoplasty (type 2a); and endoscopically assisted or muscle access abdominoplasty (type 3a). Also included in this series were patients whose procedures were downstaged to a less extensive alternative and cases during which the abdominoplasty incision was used for access for another operation. All procedures resulted in smaller or fewer incisions. Results suggested that the current period (1991–present) is marked by less invasive treatment options, characterized by a preponderance of “closed” techniques (60% vs. 40%: 1986–1991). With the availability of technology to treat muscle and adipose tissue through inconspicuous incisions, judgment regarding the capability of the skin to recontour becomes the overriding physical factor in the decision-making process. The outcomes support the conclusion that minimal-access variations in abdominoplasty are appropriate alternatives, reflecting a philosophical alteration in the approach to patients.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: