Beyond Arrogance and Ad Hominem: A Reply to Hal Lawson

Abstract
The authors find Lawson's article to be both incorrect as to facts concerning the preparation of physical education teachers and misleading in the attempted analysis of problems in professional preparation. As such, the arguments set forth in the article will confuse and mislead rather than edify readers. Problematic areas in teacher preparation and the typical disciplinary agenda for reform are reviewed. Lawson's complex arguments are reduced to simple statements and critical errors of logic and fact are identified.