Prostate biopsy: how many cores are enough?
- 30 April 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
- Vol. 21 (2) , 135-140
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1078-1439(03)00006-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of prior biopsy scheme on pathologic features of cancers detected on repeat biopsiesUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 2004
- Extended Peripheral Zone Biopsy Schemes Increase Cancer Detection Rates and Minimize Variance in Prostate Specific Antigen and Age Related Cancer Rates: Results of a Community Multi-Practice StudyJournal of Urology, 2003
- Use of Extended Systematic Sampling in Patients With a Prior Negative Prostate Needle BiopsyJournal of Urology, 2002
- PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS USING A SATURATION NEEDLE BIOPSY TECHNIQUE AFTER PREVIOUS NEGATIVE SEXTANT BIOPSIESJournal of Urology, 2001
- OPTIMAL COMBINATIONS OF SYSTEMATIC SEXTANT AND LATERALLY DIRECTED BIOPSIES FOR THE DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2001
- SYSTEMATIC TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED TEMPLATE BIOPSY OF THE PROSTATE IN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISKJournal of Urology, 2001
- A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SEXTANT AND AN EXTENDED 11-CORE MULTISITE DIRECTED BIOPSY STRATEGYJournal of Urology, 2000
- INCIDENCE AND CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF FALSE-NEGATIVE SEXTANT PROSTATE BIOPSIESJournal of Urology, 1998
- Systematic 5 Region Prostate Biopsy is Superior to Sextant Method for Diagnosing Carcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1997
- Zonal Distribution of Prostatic AdenocarcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1988