Use of Exclusion Criteria in Selecting Research Subjects and Its Effect on the Generalizability of Alcohol Treatment Outcome Studies
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in American Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 157 (4) , 588-594
- https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.4.588
Abstract
Researchers have not systematically examined how exclusion criteria used in selection of research subjects affect the generalizability of treatment outcome research. This study evaluated the use of exclusion criteria in alcohol treatment outcome research and its effects on the comparability of research subjects with real-world individuals seeking alcohol treatment. Eight of the most common exclusion criteria described in the alcohol treatment research literature were operationalized and applied to large, representative clinical patient samples from the public and private sectors to determine whether the hypothetical research samples differed substantially from real-world samples. Five hundred ninety-three consecutive individuals seeking alcohol treatment at one of eight treatment programs participated. A trained research technician gathered information from participants on demographic variables and on alcohol, drug, and psychiatric problems as measured by the Addiction Severity Index. Large proportions of potential research subjects were excluded under most of the criteria tested. The overall pattern of results showed that African Americans, low-income individuals, and individuals who had more severe alcohol, drug, and psychiatric problems were disproportionately excluded under most criteria. Exclusion criteria can result in alcohol treatment outcome research samples that are more heavily composed of white, economically stable, and higher-functioning individuals than are real-world samples of substance abuse patients seen in clinical practice, potentially compromising the generalizability of results. For both scientific and ethical reasons, in addition to studies that use exclusion criteria, outcome research that uses no or minimal exclusion criteria should be conducted so that alcohol treatment outcome research can be better generalized to vulnerable populations.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment Research at the Crossroads: The Scientific Interface of Clinical Trials and Effectiveness ResearchAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
- Run-in Periods in Randomized TrialsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Evaluating an alcohol and drug treatment program for the homeless: An econometric approachEvaluation and Program Planning, 1997
- Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1997
- Explaining abstinence rates following treatment for alcohol abuse: a quantitative synthesis of patient, research design and treatment effectsAddiction, 1996
- The cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism: a second approximation.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1996
- The Community Epidemiology Laboratory: studying alcohol problems in community and agency-based populationsAddiction, 1995
- New Data from the Addiction Severity Index Reliability and Validity in Three CentersJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1985
- An Improved Diagnostic Evaluation Instrument for Substance Abuse PatientsJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1980
- Prognostic Indicators of Alcoholism Treatment OutcomeInternational Journal of the Addictions, 1977