Dose Escalation Study of Carboplatin and Cyclophosphamide With Filgrastim Support
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 21 (3) , 263-269
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-199806000-00012
Abstract
This clinical trial was designed to explore dose escalation of carboplatin and cyclophosphamide when supported with filgrastim. Twenty-seven patients who had advanced solid tumors received up to six cycles of treatment; a total of 92 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered. Two control groups received standard-dose carboplatin (300 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), with and without filgrastim. Subsequently, the doses of both carboplatin and cyclophosphamide were increased simultaneously by 50% of the standard dose in sequential cohorts. Doses of up to 2.5 times the standard dose were explored. A final dose of carboplatin, 600 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide, 1,500 mg/m2, was tested in 4 patients. The duration of neutropenia was brief, even at the highest dose levels. The mean duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 5.8 days at standard dose without filgrastim and 5.4 days at 2.5 times standard dose with filgrastim. More severe neutropenia was more prolonged at higher doses but remained brief in duration. The mean duration of eutropenia of less than 100 × 106/l was 0.4 days at standard dose without filgrastim and 1.3 days at 2.5 times standard dose. There was no evidence of cumulative neutropenia over repeated cycles of treatment. In contrast, thrombocytopenia was both dose limiting and cumulative. The mean duration of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was 1.6 days at standard dose and 9.6 days at 2.5 times standard dose. An average of 2.3 platelet transfusions per cycle of treatment was required at the highest dose. Thrombocytopenia was worse with repetitive cycles of therapy. The mean duration of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was 2.2 days after the first cycle of chemotherapy and 7.8 days after cycle four. The maximum tolerated dose, as defined prospectively, was not reached but further dose escalation 1as not thought to be warranted because of the severity of thrombocytopenia. When supported with filgrastim, carboplatin and cyclophosphamide can be administered safely with substantially increased dose and acceptable toxicity.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thrombopoietic effects of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) in patients with advanced cancerPublished by Elsevier ,1996
- Randomised study of two doses of cisplatin with cyclophosphamide in epithelial ovarian cancerThe Lancet, 1992
- Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Effect of peripheral-blood progenitor cells mobilised by filgrastim (G-CSF) on platelet recovery after high-dose chemotherapyThe Lancet, 1992
- Reduction by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor of Fever and Neutropenia Induced by Chemotherapy in Patients with Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1989
- High dose carboplatin in the treatment of lung cancer and mesotherlioma: a phase I dose escalation studyEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1987
- Phase I trial of carboplatin-cyclophosphamide and iproplatin-cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group studyCancer Treatment Reviews, 1985
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981