The Peer Review Process: The Art of Judgment
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal for Healthcare Quality
- Vol. 17 (3) , 11-16
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.1995.tb00773.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use and Abuse of Practice ProfilesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Evaluating the Care of General Medicine Inpatients: How Good Is Implicit Review?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1993
- Quality Assurance Implications of Federal Peer Review Laws: The Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data BankQuality Assurance and Utilization Review, 1992
- The reliability of peer assessments of quality of carePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- Medicare Peer Review Organization preprocedure review criteria. An analysis of criteria for three proceduresPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- A comparison of implicit and explicit methods of process quality assurance for blunt trauma patientsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990
- Assessing Peer Review in the Quest for Improved Medical Services: Part IIIQuality Assurance and Utilization Review, 1990
- Assessing Peer Review in the Quest for Improved Medical Services: Part IIQuality Assurance and Utilization Review, 1990
- The Relationship Between Lung Cancer and Asbestos ExposureChest, 1988
- 1987 Letourneau award: Enforcing hospital responsibility through self‐evaluation and review committee confidentialityJournal of Legal Medicine, 1988