Disease biology rather than age is the most important determinant of survival of patients ≥ 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia treated with uniform intensive therapy
Open Access
- 13 April 2005
- Vol. 103 (10) , 2082-2090
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21006
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the outcome of patients ≥ 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated uniformly with high‐dose daunorubicin containing induction and modified high‐dose cytosine arabinoside containing postremission therapy, and to identify factors predictive of complete disease remission (CR) and survival. METHODS Between 1998 and 2002, the authors treated 117 newly diagnosed patients (acute promyelocytic leukemia excluded) with AML ≥ 60 years (median, 67 years; range, 60–82 years). Karyotype (Medical Research Council classification) at diagnosis was categorized as good risk (n = 3), intermediate risk (n = 69), adverse risk (n = 26), and suboptimal/not done (n = 19). A normal karyotype was seen in 41 patients and 40 (34%) had secondary AML. RESULTS The outcome of induction included the following: CR, 62 (53%); early death, 5 (4%); death during hypoplasia, 14 (12%); and resistant disease, 36 (31%). The 3‐year event‐free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 9% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3–16%) and 17% (95% CI, 9–29%), respectively. In a univariate analysis, cytogenetics, lactate dehydrogenase level, leukocyte count, and performance status were the significant factors for EFS and OS. Age was not a significant prognostic factor for either CR or survival. In a multivariate model, adverse‐risk cytogenetics, previous history of myelodysplastic syndrome or antecedent hematologic disorder, and high leukocyte count (> 30 × 109/L) were independent adverse prognostic factors for survival. The impact of adverse karyotype on EFS and OS was time dependent and was observed after 50 and 150 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The authors concluded that candidacy for intensive therapy in older patients should be based on biologic features of disease and fitness, rather than on age. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Presalvage prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time as predictors of biochemical failure of salvage cryotherapy in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapyCancer, 2006
- A phase 3 study of three induction regimens and of priming with GM-CSF in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupBlood, 2004
- Assessment of Differences in Patient Populations Selected for or Excluded From Participation in Clinical Phase III Acute Myelogenous Leukemia TrialsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Outcome after induction chemotherapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia is not improved with mitoxantrone and etoposide compared to cytarabine and daunorubicin: a Southwest Oncology Group studyBlood, 2002
- Acute myelogenous leukaemia in older patients at St Bartholomew's Hospital: outcome with mitoxantrone and cytarabineThe Hematology Journal, 2002
- Patients with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia and complex karyotype aberrations show a poor prognosis despite intensive treatment: a study of 90 patientsBritish Journal of Haematology, 2001
- Underrepresentation of Patients 65 Years of Age or Older in Cancer-Treatment TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Serum LDH value as a predictor of clinical outcome in acute myelogenous leukaemia of the elderlyBritish Journal of Haematology, 1996
- Acute myelogenous leukaemia in the elderly: retrospective study of 235 consecutive patientsBritish Journal of Haematology, 1994
- Failure of remission induction in acute myelocytic leukemiaMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1978