Clinical Practice Guidelines in nephrology—for worse or for better
Open Access
- 6 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Vol. 21 (5) , 1145-1153
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfl084
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs)* (throughout the text, terms marked with an asterisk are defined in Table 1 in alphabetical order) [ 1 ] have become important tools in shaping the care of individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). CPGs inform patient care, scientific debate, research agendas and policies. At the same time, CPGs have been criticized for restricting the care provided by physicians to patients. This article is intended as a review of selected topics related to guideline development and its application in nephrology, which ultimately aim at informing decision making and improving the quality of care.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adding Value to Evidence-Based Clinical GuidelinesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2005
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2004
- Paying Physicians for High-Quality CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): How Can We Improve the Care of Hemodialysis Patients?Seminars in Dialysis, 2001
- Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisalThe Lancet, 2000
- Are Guidelines Following Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelinesInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1999
- Understanding Geographic Variations in Health Care DeliveryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Geographic Variations in Utilization Rates in Veterans Affairs Hospitals and ClinicsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Practice Guidelines: A New Reality in MedicineArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1990