The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire: a valid tool for measuring the presence and severity of dyspepsia
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 12 (12) , 1257-1262
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00404.x
Abstract
There is currently no validated questionnaire that assesses both the presence and severity of dyspepsia. To develop the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (LDQ) as a measure of the presence and severity of dyspepsia, and to assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of this instrument. Unselected patients attending either a hospital dyspepsia clinic or a general practice surgery were interviewed by a trained gastroenterologist or a general practitioner on the presence and severity of dyspepsia. This opinion was compared with the results of the nurse-administered LDQ. Test–retest reliability was assessed by the same research nurse re-administering the LDQ 4–7 days after the initial visit in a subgroup of hospital patients. In a further subgroup of patients one researcher interviewed the patients and a second researcher re-administered the LDQ within 30 min to evaluate inter-rater reliability. The responsiveness of the LDQ was measured by repeating it in patients with endoscopically proven peptic ulcer or oesophagitis 1 month after receiving appropriate therapy. The LDQ was administered to 99 general practice and 215 hospital patients. In the GP population 41/98 (42%) had dyspepsia according to the GP and the LDQ had a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI: 65–91%) and a specificity of 79% (95% CI: 66–89%). The weighted kappa statistic for the agreement between the LDQ and the clinician for the severity of dyspepsia was 0.58 in the GP population and 0.49 in hospital patients. The kappa statistic for test–retest reliability was 0.83 in 107 patients. The LDQ had excellent inter-rater reliability with a kappa statistic of 0.90 in 42 patients. The median LDQ score fell from 22.5 (range 9–36) to 4.5 (range 0–27) in 12 patients 1 month after receiving appropriate therapy (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < 0.0001). The LDQ is a valid, reliable and responsive instrument for measuring the presence and severity of dyspepsia.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score ??? a tool for the global measurement of dyspepsiaEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 1996
- Helicobacter pyloriand Non-ulcer DyspepsiaScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1996
- Can severity of symptoms be used as an outcome measure in trials of non-ulcer dyspepsia and helicobacter pylori associated gastritis?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- A Systematic Overview (Meta-Analysis) of Outcome Measures in Helicobacter pylori Gastritis Trials and Functional DyspepsiaScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1993
- Can Gastritis Symptoms Be Evaluated in Clinical Trials? An Overview of Treatment of Gastritis, Nonulcer Dyspepsia and Campylobacter-Associated GastritisJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1989
- Dyspeptic symptoms in the community.Gut, 1989
- Prevalence of symptoms of dyspepsia in the community.BMJ, 1989
- Discriminant value of dyspeptic symptoms: a study of the clinical presentation of 221 patients with dyspepsia of unknown cause, peptic ulceration, and cholelithiasis.Gut, 1987
- Continuous self-recording of epigastric pain with two rating scales: Compliance, authenticity, reliability, and sensitivityJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1983
- Clinical presentation of patients with "dyspepsia". Detailed symptomatic study of 360 patients.Gut, 1978