Bayesian methods for analysis of binary outcome data in cluster randomized trials on the absolute risk scale
- 29 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 23 (3) , 389-410
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1567
Abstract
A Bayesian hierarchical modelling approach to the analysis of cluster randomized trials has advantages in terms of allowing for full parameter uncertainty, flexible modelling of covariates and variance structure, and use of prior information. Previously, such modelling of binary outcome data required use of a log‐odds ratio scale for the treatment effect estimate and an approximation linking the intracluster correlation (ICC) to the between‐cluster variance on a log‐odds scale. In this paper we develop this method to allow estimation on the absolute risk scale, which facilitates clinical interpretation of both the treatment effect and the between‐cluster variance. We describe a range of models and apply them to data from a trial of different interventions to promote secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care. We demonstrate how these models can be used to incorporate prior data about typical ICCs, to derive a posterior distribution for the number needed to treat, and to consider both cluster and individual level covariates. Using these methods, we can benefit from the advantages of Bayesian modelling of binary outcome data at the same time as providing results on a clinically interpretable scale. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of paramedic practitioners in attending 999 calls from elderly people in the community: cluster randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2007
- Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and FitJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2002
- Bayesian random effects meta‐analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scalesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Cluster randomised controlled trial to compare three methods of promoting secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primaryBMJ, 2001
- Cohort versus cross‐sectional design in large field trials: Precision, sample size, and a unifying modelStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responsesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1992
- An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- The Variance of Intraclass Correlation Involving Groups with One ObservationBiometrics, 1964