Degree of Detail of Eyewitness Testimony and Mock Juror Judgments1
- 1 November 1988
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 18 (14) , 1171-1192
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01200.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line.Psychological Review, 1986
- The Influence of Eyewitness Nonidentifications on Mock‐Jurors' Judgments of a Court Case1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1985
- The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984
- Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect.Psychological Review, 1982
- Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect.Psychological Review, 1982
- Can people detect eyewitness-identification accuracy within and across situations?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981
- Can people detect eyewitness-identification accuracy within and across situations?Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981
- Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979