Role of reward magnitude and incomplete reduction of reward magnitude in the frustration effect.
- 1 January 1965
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 70 (5) , 490-495
- https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022577
Abstract
Thirty naive food-deprived (22-hr.) male rats received 72 acquisition and 96 postshift trials in an L-shaped double-alley apparatus. In acquisition 16 Ss (Group 10) received 10 45-mg. pellets in the 1st goal box (G1) on each trial, while 14 Ss (Group 2) received 2 pellets in G1. In every block of 6 postshift trials, Group 2 received 2 pellets in G1 on 3 trials and no reward on 3 trials, while Group 10 received 10 pellets on 3 trials, 2 pellets on 1 trial, and no reward on 2 trials. Both groups always received 2 pellets in the 2nd goal box. Final postshift speeds were inversely related to absolute (postshift) G1 reward magnitude, but unrelated to excepted (acquisition) reward magnitude.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Magnitude of the frustration effect as a function of confinement and detention in the frustrating situation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964
- Frustration Effect as a Function of DrivePsychological Reports, 1964
- The role of reinforcement and nonreinforcement in an "apparent frustration effect."Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959
- Motivational properties of frustration: III. Relation of frustration effect to antedating goal factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957