The Discredible Eyewitness
- 1 March 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 8 (1) , 60-67
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728281010
Abstract
In a recent, widely publicized finding (Loftus, 1974), eyewitness testimony heightened judgments of guilt even when the testimony was discredited In Study I we offered two hypotheses to explain this finding: that it depends on the order of presentation of evidence, and/or that the discreditors had low credibility due to their self-interest. Contrary to prediction, we found that eyewitness testimony did not heighten judgments of guilt when it was discredited. In Study 2, we replicated our results, again reversing Loftus' original findings, even when the eyewitness was allowed to reaffirm his identification after the discreditation.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of expert psychological advice on human performance in judging the validity of eyewitness testimony.Law and Human Behavior, 1980
- Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- Causal Schemata in Judgments under UncertaintyPublished by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,1977
- Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- The Psychology of Criminal Identification: The Gap from Wade to KirbyUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1973