Trust, terrorism and public health
Open Access
- 28 October 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 31 (4) , 462-465
- https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdp091
Abstract
Policies to promote public health are based on trust. There is a danger that public trust may be lost, especially where policies are seen to be influenced by vested interests or conflict with available evidence. Although trust in public health policies in the UK is high, some commentators have questioned recent responses to the threat of pandemic flu, suggesting that they may be driven, in part, by those seeking to profit from health scares, and drawing a direct comparison with terrorist scares. We argue that the approach to evidence by the public health and counter-terrorist communities differ markedly. Public health professionals must ensure that their actions do not undermine their credibility, in particular those involved in response to the threat of bioterrorism.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of food intake during labour on obstetric outcome: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2009
- Terrorism and the Proportionality of Internet SurveillanceEuropean Journal of Criminology, 2009
- Trust and Experience as Predictors of HPV Vaccine AcceptanceHuman Vaccines, 2007
- Risk Communication for Public Health EmergenciesAnnual Review of Public Health, 2007
- Reflections on the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccination ProgramEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2006
- The Mad Cow Problem in the UK: Risk Perceptions, Risk Management, and Health Policy DevelopmentJournal of Public Health Policy, 1998
- Secret government: the Scott reportBMJ, 1996
- The Effectiveness of Antiterrorism Policies: A Vector-Autoregression-Intervention AnalysisAmerican Political Science Review, 1993