Modelling stomatal conductanceof field‐grown sunflower under varying soil water content and leafenvironment: comparison of three models of stomatal response toleaf environment and coupling with an abscisic acid‐based modelof stomatal response to soil drying
- 29 October 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Plant, Cell & Environment
- Vol. 25 (11) , 1423-1434
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00937.x
Abstract
Stomatal conductance, gs, responds both tothe immediate or local environment of the leaf, such as CO2 partialpressure and irradiance, and to root‐sourced signals of water stress,particularly abscisic acid (ABA). Two models for the combined controlof gs were formulated and tested in sunflower(Helianthus annuus). First, several empirical models weretested for the local control, demonstrating that the Ball–Berrymodel [Ball, Woodrow & Berry (in Progress in PhotosynthesisResearch Vol. 4, pp. 5.221–5.224: M. Nijhoff,Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 1987] is consistently amongthe most accurate. A problem of statistical non‐independence inthis model is shown to be minor. The model offers regularity ofparameter values among most species and, despite an oversimplicationin representing known humidity‐response mechanisms, it incorporates othersignalling loops from CO2 and assimilation. In the firstcombined model, ABA as its concentration in xylem sap, [ABA]xy,down‐regulates the slope, m, in the Ball–Berry modelby the factor gfac = exp(– β[ABA]xy).The ABA‐induced reduction in gs decreases CO2 assimilation andsurface humidity, thus appearing to induce the local‐control mechanismto amplify the ABA‐induced stomatal closure. In the second combinedmodel, gs is estimated as the minimum of the local(Ball–Berry) response and the product gfac gs,max,with gs,max as a maximal unstressed conductance.Both models can predict gs from the external environmentalvariables with good accuracy (r2 near 0·8 over20‐fold variations in gs). Further analyses showthat gs responds to humidity almost quadraticallyrather than linearly. It also responds to assimilation as a powerlaw with an exponent that is significantly less than 1. These limitations,shared by other models, suggest more research into biochemical signalling.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- The temperature dependence of shoot hydraulic resistance: implications for stomatal behaviour and hydraulic limitationPlant, Cell & Environment, 2001
- Apparent Controls on Leaf Conductance by Soil Water Availability and via Light‐Acclimation of Foliage Structural and Physiological Properties in a Mixed Deciduous, Temperate ForestInternational Journal of Plant Sciences, 1999
- Accumulation rate of ABA in detached maize roots correlates with root water potential regardless of age and branching orderPlant, Cell & Environment, 1998
- The coupled response of stomatal conductance to photosynthesis and transpirationJournal of Experimental Botany, 1998
- Diurnal change in the relationship between stomatal conductance and abscisic acid in the xylem sap of field-grown peach treesJournal of Experimental Botany, 1997
- Hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in Douglas fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] and alder [Alnus rubra (Bong)] seedlingsPlant, Cell & Environment, 1996
- Acclimation of Stomatal Conductance to a CO2-Enriched Atmosphere and Elevated Temperature in Chenopodium albumFunctional Plant Biology, 1996
- A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidityPlant, Cell & Environment, 1995
- The relationship between the Rubisco reaction mechanism and models of photosynthesis*Plant, Cell & Environment, 1990
- A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 speciesPlanta, 1980