Reconciling Two Approaches to the Detection of Anthropogenic Influence on Climate
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Climate
- Vol. 15 (3) , 326-329
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0326:rtattd>2.0.co;2
Abstract
Anthropogenic influences on surface temperature over the second half of the twentieth century are examined using output from two general circulation models (HadCM2 and ECHAM3). Optimal detection techniques involve the comparison of observed temperature changes with those simulated by a climate model, using a control integration to test the null hypothesis that all the observed changes are due to natural variability. Two recent studies have examined the influence of greenhouse gases and the direct effect of sulfate aerosol on surface temperature using output from the same two climate models but with many differences in the methods applied. Both detected overall anthropogenic influence on climate, but results on the separate detection of greenhouse gas and sulfate aerosol influences were different. This paper concludes that the main differences between the results can be explained by the season over which temperatures were averaged, the length of the climatology from which anomalies were taken, and... Abstract Anthropogenic influences on surface temperature over the second half of the twentieth century are examined using output from two general circulation models (HadCM2 and ECHAM3). Optimal detection techniques involve the comparison of observed temperature changes with those simulated by a climate model, using a control integration to test the null hypothesis that all the observed changes are due to natural variability. Two recent studies have examined the influence of greenhouse gases and the direct effect of sulfate aerosol on surface temperature using output from the same two climate models but with many differences in the methods applied. Both detected overall anthropogenic influence on climate, but results on the separate detection of greenhouse gas and sulfate aerosol influences were different. This paper concludes that the main differences between the results can be explained by the season over which temperatures were averaged, the length of the climatology from which anomalies were taken, and...Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attribution of twentieth century temperature change to natural and anthropogenic causesClimate Dynamics, 2001
- Optimal detection and attribution of climate change: sensitivity of results to climate model differencesClimate Dynamics, 2000
- Detection and Attribution of Recent Climate Change: A Status ReportBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1999
- Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprintingClimate Dynamics, 1999
- Climate Forcing by Changing Solar RadiationJournal of Climate, 1998
- Scale-Dependent Detection of Climate ChangeJournal of Climate, 1998
- Multi-fingerprint detection and attribution analysis of greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas-plus-aerosol and solar forced climate changeClimate Dynamics, 1997
- Multi-pattern fingerprint method for detection and attribution of climate changeClimate Dynamics, 1997
- The second Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: model description, spinup and validationClimate Dynamics, 1997
- Interdecadal changes of surface temperature since the late nineteenth centuryJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1994