A comparison of the balanced matrix method and the aggregation method of model reduction
- 1 January 1983
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Abstract
The balanced matrix method and the aggregation method for model reduction are compared. It is shown that there is a "natural" choice for the aggregated reduced model output matrix that makes the aggregated model comparable to the balanced matrix reduced-order model. This assumes that the eigenvalues retained in the aggregated model are truly dominant and that the orders of the two models are equal. However, there are situations in which the choice of the eigenvalues to be retained in an aggregated model is not obvious. In these cases the balanced matrix method is superior. Two á priori error response measurements are given to compare the models. The models are also compared in two numerical examples.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Model reduction via balanced state space representationsIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1982
- Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reductionIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1981
- A review of some model reduction techniquesCanadian Electrical Engineering Journal, 1981
- Model reduction for linear multivariable systemsIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1980
- Survey of decentralized control methods for large scale systemsIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1978
- Aggregation matrices for a class of low-order models for large-scale systemsElectronics Letters, 1975
- Control of large-scale dynamic systems by aggregationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1968
- On "A method for simplifying linear dynamic systems"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1967
- A method for simplifying linear dynamic systemsIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1966