Quality of life
- 1 August 1987
- Vol. 60 (S3) , 620-622
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19870801)60:3+<620::aid-cncr2820601529>3.0.co;2-b
Abstract
The term quality of life (QL) is a global characterization usually consisting of the following factors: physical function, symptoms from disease and/or treatment, occupational and social interactions, and psychological parameters, including mood with some overall assessment of well-being, such as happiness or satisfaction. For the purposes of individual patient management, the physician often assesses many of these in the process of making decisions about cancer care. The aggregate assessment of QL in groups of patients is more difficult. The increasing subjectivity and difficulty in measurement as medical observers move from the physical (objective parameters) to the psychosocial (subjective parameters) has hindered our ability to study QL. The changing status of the patient from initial symptomatic disease, to the incapacitation related to the treatment and/or the ongoing course of the disease often leading to death makes the measurement of QL a moving target. One must be very specific as to the malignancy, the status of disease, the treatments with their side effects and sequela, and the time of measurement in this dynamic spectrum, if the data is to be comparable and to permit generalizations. For the purposes of clinical trials the emphasis remains with the physical factors: function and symptom control. Even these factors are difficult to assess consistently, making the aggregation of such data from similarly treated groups of patients sometimes suspect. The ability to determine the impact of disease and treatment on these factors in a reliable manner could make possible, with aggregated data from many patients, more objective assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of a particular therapy. Late sequelae of treatment may also be important. When cure or prolonged survival are not likely or possible then the ability to determine the probable effects, physical and psychosocial, of a specific treatment on an individual patient is valuable. Treatment then can be guided to some extent by QL considerations.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of Quality‐of‐Life Considerations in Medical Decision MakingJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1985
- The Quality of Life of Patients with End-Stage Renal DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileal reservoirBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- The quality of life of cancer patients: A review of the literatureSocial Science & Medicine, 1985
- The Improved Quality of Life with the Kock Continent IleostomyJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1984
- Comparison of Quality of Life of Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis, Hemodialysis, and After TransplantationAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1984
- Quality of life in cancer patientsAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984
- The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patientsBritish Journal of Cancer, 1984
- Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984
- Investigation of the Karnofsky Performance Status as a measure of quality of life.Health Psychology, 1984