Adjustment to Retirement: Continuity vs. Discontinuity
- 1 September 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Aging & Human Development
- Vol. 33 (2) , 151-169
- https://doi.org/10.2190/6rpt-u8gn-vucv-p0tu
Abstract
This research examines gender differences in adjustment to retirement during the first year of retirement. It identifies differences in patterns of adjustment and differences in the discriminating variables that predict these patterns. The study was longitudinal in design and included a pretest interview of 250 people at the time of retirement, a posttest interview of 242 retirees six months after retirement, and a one-year follow-up of 222 completed by mail. A significant main effect for time was found for all three adjustment variables, with well-being declining at the six-month interval. A discriminant analysis of three types of adjustment groups revealed that responses to retirement varies depending on several factors. The findings suggest the need for a dynamic view of continuity theory.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Continuity Theory of Normal AgingThe Gerontologist, 1989
- Gender Differences in Retirement Satisfaction and its AntecedentsResearch on Aging, 1986
- Sex Differences in the Antecedents and Consequences of RetirementJournal of Gerontology, 1984
- Major Role Losses and Social Participation of Older MalesResearch on Aging, 1983
- Retirement: Leaving the World of WorkThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1982
- A Reconceptualization of Continuity Theory: Some Preliminary ThoughtsThe Gerontologist, 1981
- Retirement Style and Retirement Satisfaction: Retirees Aren't All AlikeInternational Journal of Aging & Human Development, 1981
- Subjective Adaptation to Loss of the Work Role: A Longitudinal StudyJournal of Gerontology, 1977
- Employment, Retirement, and Morale Among Older WomenJournal of Gerontology, 1976
- A Role Theory Approach to Adjustment in Old AgeAmerican Sociological Review, 1957