Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant
Top Cited Papers
- 27 September 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 112 (4) , 1664-1674
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1502901
Abstract
The goal of the present study was to investigate the time course of adaptation by experienced cochlear implant users to a shifted frequency-to-electrode assignment in their speech processors. Speech recognition performance of three Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users was measured over a 3-month period, during which the implant listeners continuously wore “experimental” speech processors that were purposely shifted by 2–4 mm in terms of the frequency-to-electrode assignment relative to their normal processor. Baseline speech performance was measured with each subject’s clinically assigned speech processor just prior to implementation of the experimental processor. Baseline speech performance was measured again after the 3-month test period, immediately following the reinstallation of the clinically assigned processor settings. Speech performance with the experimental processor was measured four times during the first week, and weekly thereafter over the 3-month period. Results showed that the experimental processor produced significantly lower performance on all measures of speech recognition immediately following implementation. Over the 3-month test period, consonant and HINT sentence recognition with the experimental processors gradually approached a performance level comparable to but still significantly below the baseline and postexperiment measures made with the clinically assigned processor. However, vowel and TIMIT sentence recognition with the experimental processors remained far below the level of the baseline measures even at the end of the 3-month experimental period. There was no significant change in performance with the clinically assigned processor before or after fitting with the experimental processor. The results suggest that a long-time exposure to a new pattern of stimulation may not be able to compensate for the deficit in performance caused by a 2–4-mm shift in the tonotopic location of stimulation, at least within a 3-month period.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of ageThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000
- Effect of acoustic dynamic range on phoneme recognition in quiet and noise by cochlear implant usersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1999
- Effects of Electrode Configuration and Frequency Allocation on Vowel Recognition with the Nucleus-22 Cochlear ImplantEar & Hearing, 1999
- Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1999
- Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998
- Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listenersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998
- Speech Recognition as a Function of the Number of Electrodes Used in the SPEAK Cochlear Implant Speech ProcessorJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1997
- Changes in Speech Intelligibility as a Function of Time and Signal Processing Strategy for an Ineraid Patient Fitted with Continuous Interleaved Sampling (CIS) ProcessorsEar & Hearing, 1997
- Acoustic characteristics of American English vowelsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years laterThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990