Sparse Sets, Lowness and Highness
- 1 August 1986
- journal article
- Published by Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM) in SIAM Journal on Computing
- Vol. 15 (3) , 739-747
- https://doi.org/10.1137/0215053
Abstract
We develop the notions of “generalized lowness” for sets in PH (the union of the polynomial-time hierarchy) and of “generalized highness” for arbitrary sets. Also, we develop the notions of “extended lowness” and “extended highness” for arbitrary sets. These notions extend the decomposition of NP into low sets and high sets developed by Schöning [15] and studied by Ko and Schöning [9].\ud \ud We show that either every sparse set in PH is generalized high or no sparse set in PH is generalized high. Further, either every sparse set is extended high or no sparse set is extended high. In both situations, the former case corresponds to the polynomial-time hierarchy having only finitely many levels while the latter case corresponds to the polynomial-time hierarchy extending infinitely many levels.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published versionKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relativizing complexity classes with sparse oraclesJournal of the ACM, 1986
- On self-reducibility and weak P-selectivityJournal of Computer and System Sciences, 1983
- Strong nondeterministic polynomial-time reducibilitiesTheoretical Computer Science, 1982
- A note on sparse oracles for NPJournal of Computer and System Sciences, 1982
- A second step toward the polynomial hierarchyTheoretical Computer Science, 1979
- A Note on Sparse Complete SetsSIAM Journal on Computing, 1979
- Two theorems on random polynomial timePublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,1978
- Relationship between density and deterministic complexity of MP-complete languagesPublished by Springer Nature ,1978
- On Isomorphisms and Density of $NP$ and Other Complete SetsSIAM Journal on Computing, 1977
- Relativizations of the $\mathcal{P} = ?\mathcal{NP}$ QuestionSIAM Journal on Computing, 1975