Dominant and Competing Paradigms in Gerontology: Towards a Political Economy of Ageing
- 1 July 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Ageing and Society
- Vol. 2 (2) , 151-164
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x00009405
Abstract
The origins and influence of social science perspectives have conditioned theoretical and empirical developments in the field of gerontology. Yet little systematic examination has been afforded to the role of social science in the production of gerontological knowledge in providing the underlying rationale for American social policy for the aged. This paper examines the dominant U.S. social science perspectives or paradigms and discusses the reasons for their centrality in American gerontological thought. The paper concludes with a proposal for an alternative line of inquiry — a political economy of ageing — which takes as problematic the effects of social history, the world economy, capitalism and social class on the ageing process and the aged and the policy interventions designed for them.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ageism: Prejudice and Discrimination Against the Elderly.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1983
- Income Inequality and Status MaintenanceResearch on Aging, 1981
- The Aging EnterpriseJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1981
- The Political Economy of the Welfare StateBritish Journal of Sociology, 1980
- The Social Creation of Poverty and Dependency in Old AgeJournal of Social Policy, 1980
- Notes for a Radical GerontologyInternational Journal of Aging & Human Development, 1979
- Status Attainment and Status Maintenance: A Study of Stratification in Old AgeAmerican Sociological Review, 1976
- Interest-Group Liberalism and the Politics of AgingThe Gerontologist, 1972
- The Social Construction of RealityThe Modern Language Journal, 1967
- Organizational Transformation: A Case Study of a Declining Social MovementAmerican Sociological Review, 1955