Evaluating Isolate Aggressiveness and Host Resistance from Peanut Leaflet Inoculations with Sclerotinia minor
Open Access
- 1 April 2003
- journal article
- Published by Scientific Societies in Plant Disease
- Vol. 87 (4) , 402-406
- https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis.2003.87.4.402
Abstract
Sclerotinia minor is a major pathogen of peanut in North Carolina, Virginia, Oklahoma, and Texas. Partial resistance to S. minor has been reported based on field screening, but field performance is not always correlated with laboratory or greenhouse evaluations of resistance. More efficient screening methods and better understanding of the mechanisms contributing to Sclerotinia blight resistance are needed, and a detached leaf assay was developed and evaluated. Detached leaflets of 12 greenhouse-grown peanut lines were inoculated on the adaxial surface with a 4-mm-diameter mycelial plug of a single isolate of S. minor. Leaflets were incubated in the dark at 20°C in Nalgene utility boxes containing moistened sand. Lesion length 3 days after inoculation ranged from 11 to 24 mm, with a mean of 19 mm. Lengths differed significantly among the entries, with GP-NC WS 12, an advanced breeding line derived from a cross of NC 6 × (NC 3033 × GP-NC WS 1), being the most resistant. Forty-eight isolates of S. minor obtained from peanut were inoculated on leaflets of the susceptible cultivar NC 7 and aggressiveness was assessed by measuring lesion-length expansion. Three days after inoculation, lesion length differed among the isolates and ranged from 2 to 24 mm, with a mean of 15 mm. Finally, the potential for specific interactions between peanut lines and S. minor isolates was evaluated. A subset of S. minor isolates was selected to represent the observed range of aggressiveness and a subset of peanut entries was selected to represent the range of resistance or susceptibility. Nine-week-old greenhouse- or field-grown plants were compared for five peanut entries. Main effects of isolates and entries were highly significant, but isolate-entry interactions were not significant. The most resistant peanut entry (GP-NC WS 12) performed consistently with all isolates regardless of plant source.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Weed Species as Hosts of Sclerotinia minor in Peanut FieldsPlant Disease, 2003
- Resistance of Peanut to Sclerotinia Blight and the Effect of Acibenzolar-S-methyl and Fluazinam on Disease IncidencePlant Disease, 2002
- Evaluation of Detached Shoot and Leaflet Inoculation Techniques to Screen Peanut Genotypes for Resistance to Rhizoctonia Limb RotPeanut Science, 2001
- Reaction of Soybean Cultivars to Sclerotinia Stem Rot in Field, Greenhouse, and Laboratory EvaluationsCrop Science, 2000
- Transmissible hypovirulence inSclerotinia minorCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 1996
- Limitations of In Vitro Strain Screening Methods for the Selection of Sclerotinia spp. as Potential Mycoherbicides against the Perennial Weed Ranunculus acrisBiocontrol Science and Technology, 1995
- Mechanisms of Resistance to Sclerotinia minor in selected Peanut GenotypesCrop Science, 1995
- A Rapid Method for Evaluating Genotype Resistance, Fungicide Activity, and Isolate Pathogenicity of Sclerotinia minor in Peanut.1Peanut Science, 1988
- Screening Peanuts for Resistance to Sclerotinia BlightPlant Disease, 1982
- Sclerotinia Blight of PeanutsPhytopathology®, 1974