Subjective Judgments of Clarity and Intelligibility for Filtered Stimuli With Equivalent Speech Intelligibility Index Predictions
- 1 April 1998
- journal article
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Vol. 41 (2) , 327-339
- https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4102.327
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether subjective judgments of clarity or intelligibility would be rated equally among conditions in which speech was equated for predicted intelligibility (using the Speech Intelligibility Index, SII) but varied in bandwidth. Twenty listeners with normal hearing rated clarity and intelligibility for sentence material (Hearing In Noise Test) in speech-shaped noise at six paired low- and high-pass filtered conditions in which SII was equated for each pair. For three paired conditions, predicted intelligibility increased as SII increased monotonically (0.3, 0.4, 0.5). In the remaining paired conditions, SII continued to increase monotonically (0.6, 0.7, 0.8) but predicted intelligibility was held at a maximal level (≥95%). Predicted intelligibility was estimated from the transfer function relating SII to speech recognition scores determined in preliminary experiments. Differences in ratings between paired low- and high-pass filtered sentences did not reach statistical significance for either clarity or intelligibility, indicating that the spectral differences at equivalent SIIs did not influence the judgments for either of the two dimensions. For conditions in which predicted intelligibility increased, both clarity and intelligibility ratings increased in a similar manner. For conditions in which predicted intelligibility was maximized, intelligibility ratings remained the same statistically across conditions while clarity ratings changed modestly. Although high correlations were observed between clarity and intelligibility ratings, intelligibility ratings were consistently higher than clarity ratings for comparable conditions. The results indicated that listeners with normal hearing produced clarity and intelligibility ratings for the same speech material and experimental conditions that were highly related but differed in magnitude. Caution is required when substituting clarity for intelligibility.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Frequency Importance Functions for Words, Sentences, and Continuous DiscourseJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1996
- Reliability and Sensitivity of Paired Comparisons and Category Rating in ChildrenJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1995
- Longitudinal Study of Hearing Aid Effectiveness. IIJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1993
- A Comparison of Sound Quality Judgments for Monaural and Binaural Hearing Aid Processed StimuliEar & Hearing, 1992
- Comparison of Objective and Subjective Measures of Speech Intelligibility in Elderly Hearing-Impaired ListenersJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1991
- Problems in the prediction of speech recognition among normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listenersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990
- Distribution of short-term rms levels in conversational speechThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1988
- Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent wordsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986
- Intelligibility ratings of continuous discourse: Application to hearing aid selectionThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1984
- Statistical Measurements on Conversational SpeechThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1940