Standardization in Causal Analysis
- 1 November 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methods & Research
- Vol. 10 (2) , 187-210
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000203
Abstract
In comparative study, it is argued that (1) the standardization of variables and scales should be separated from the habitual use of standardized coefficients; (2) the use of standardized coefficients implies standardizing every variable using group specific standards, and, therefore, it is not appropriate even if some variables have group specific metrics or some variables do not possess commonly accepted metrics; and (3) the explicit standardization of some or all variables can be fruitfully combined with the use of unstandardized coefficients.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Note On Standardized Coefficients as Structural ParametersSociological Methods & Research, 1976
- A Technique for Comparing Path Models Between SubgroupsSociological Methods & Research, 1976
- Standardization of scales in social science research: Breaking the routineSocial Science Research, 1974
- Problems in Making Policy Inferences from the Coleman ReportAmerican Sociological Review, 1970
- A Note of Caution in Causal ModellingAmerican Political Science Review, 1968
- Letters to the EditorAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1967
- Causal Inferences, Closed Populations, and Measures of AssociationAmerican Political Science Review, 1967
- Path Analysis: Sociological ExamplesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1966
- The Linkage between Constituency Attitudes and Congressional Voting Behavior: A Causal ModelAmerican Political Science Review, 1966
- Theory, Measurement, and Replication in the Social SciencesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1961