Ultrastructural correlates of electrical‐chemical synaptic transmission in goldfish cranial motor nuclei

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The output connections of the cranial relay neurons, part of the Mauthner cell network, were examined in goldfish with light and electron microscopic techniques. Either lueifer yellow or horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was injected into cranial relay neuron axons to demonstrate that they diverge to several motor nuclei and to many motoneurons within one nucleus. Retrograde transport of the enzyme from injections of mandibular muscles was used to label the trigeminal motoneurons. In the electron microscope, cranial relay neuron processes were distinguished by the granular appearance of the electron‐opaque polymer formed enzymatically by HRP, while the retrogradely labeled motoneurons had the polymer enclosed in lysosomes. The cranial relay neuron terminals contained many presynaptic vesicles which concentrated the HRP reaction product. Active zones and synaptic clefts were evident. At some synapses, both gap junctions and presynaptic vesicles were found. The mechanism of synaptic transmission was investigated by simultaneous recording with two intracellular microelectrodes from cranial relay neuron‐motoneuron pairs. Composite postsynaptic potentials in a trigeminal motoneuron were evoked by intracellular stimulation of a cranial relay neuron axon. The earliest excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) component had a latency of 0.25 sec and had a peak amplitude that was not depressed by repetitive stimulation. A second component had larger peak amplitudes which were reduced easily by repetitive stimulation. Antidromic action potentials were not transmitted from motoneurons to the cranial relay neuron axons. Thus, both electrical and chemical transmission probably occur at the cranial relay neuron‐motoneuron synapses. Since the cranial relay neurons fire synchronously and receive excitatory chemical synapses, the function of the gap junctions and electrical transmission is unclear. Perhaps the importance of these gap junctions is more for transport of small molecules than for impulse transmission.