Refinements in Criteria for the Determination of Death: An Appraisal
- 3 July 1972
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 221 (1) , 48-53
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1972.03200140034009
Abstract
The growing powers of medicine to combat disease and to prolong life have brought longer, healthier lives to many people. They have also brought new and difficult problems, including some which are not only medical but also fundamentally moral and political. An important example is the problem of determining whether and when a person has died—a determination that is sometimes made difficult as a direct result of new technological powers to sustain the signs of life in the severely ill and injured. Death was (and in the vast majority of cases still is) a phenomenon known to the ordinary observer through visible and palpable manifestations, such as the cessation of respiration and heartbeat. However, in a small but growing number of cases, technological intervention has rendered insufficient these traditional signs as signs of continuing life. The heartbeat can be stimulated electrically; the heart itself may soon be replaceable by aKeywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Kansas Death Statute: Bold and InnovativeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1971
- Instrumental Learning in Neodecorticate RabbitsNature New Biology, 1971
- Death as an Event: A Commentary on Robert MorisonScience, 1971
- Death: Process or Event?Science, 1971
- The Neurologist and the Concept of Brain DeathPerspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1971
- Legal and Medical Death — Kansas Takes the First StepNew England Journal of Medicine, 1971