What Makes Deterrence Work? Cases from 1900 to 1980
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 36 (4) , 496-526
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010184
Abstract
The article develops an expected-utility model of extended deterrence and tests it on 54 historical cases. Successful deterrence is associated with close economic and political ties between the defender and the state it is trying to protect, and with a local military balance in favor of the defender. Deterrence success is not systematically associated with the presence of a military alliance, with the overall strategic military balance, with possession of nuclear weapons, or with the defender's firmness or lack of it in previous crises. If deterrence fails, only alliance and the military value of the state under attack are associated with the defender's willingness to go to war.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Terror without DeterrenceJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1984
- Miscalculation in the South Atlantic: The origins of the Falkland WarJournal of Strategic Studies, 1983
- Interstate conflicts: 1815–1965International Interactions, 1982
- The War LedgerPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1980
- European Historical Statistics 1750–1970Published by Springer Nature ,1975
- An Empirical Typology of International Military AlliancesMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1971
- Pearl Harbor: Deterrence Theory and Decision TheoryJournal of Peace Research, 1967
- Formal alliances, 1815—1939Journal of Peace Research, 1966
- The calculus of deterrenceJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1963
- The Statesman's Year-BookPublished by Springer Nature ,1905