A comparison of sample size determination methods in the two group trial where the underlying disease is rare
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
- Vol. 10 (5) , 437-449
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918108812221
Abstract
Four commonly used procedures for calculating sample size in the two group trial testing equality of proportions are compared when the true underlying proportions are very small. Thearcsin formula provides the closest approximation to an exact but computationally more difficult method which determines the sample size necessary to attain a specified type I and type II e rror.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Improved Approximate Formula for Calculating Sample Sizes for Comparing Two Binomial DistributionsPublished by JSTOR ,1978
- A Graphical Aid for Determining Sample Size when Comparing Two Independent ProportionsPublished by JSTOR ,1978
- Exact Sample Sizes for Use with the Fisher-Irwin Test for 2 x 2 TablesBiometrics, 1978
- Determination of Sample Size and Selection of Cases.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1959