The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are more reliable than O and E
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Personality and Individual Differences
- Vol. 29 (5) , 907-920
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00242-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sensational interests and general personality traitsJournal of Forensic Psychiatry, 1999
- The five factor model of personality: Openness a distinct but related constructPersonality and Individual Differences, 1998
- Does the personal questionnaire provide a more sensitive measure of cardiac surgery related-anxiety than a standard pencil-and-paper checklist?Personality and Individual Differences, 1998
- Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits.Psychological Bulletin, 1997
- The Big Three or the Big Five—the EPQ-R vs the NEO-PI: a research note, replication and elaborationPersonality and Individual Differences, 1995
- Solid ground in the wetlands of personality: A reply to Block.Psychological Bulletin, 1995
- A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.Psychological Bulletin, 1995
- The development of an abbreviated form of the revised Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQR-A): Its use among students in England, Canada, the U.S.A. and AustraliaPersonality and Individual Differences, 1992
- Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3?—Criteria for a taxonomic paradigmPersonality and Individual Differences, 1991
- The ‘big five’ dimensions of personality? Evidence from ipsative, adjectival self-attributionsPersonality and Individual Differences, 1989