Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 8 (3) , 120-125
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02599753
Abstract
Objective: To measure patients’ expectations and attitudes about screening flexible sigmoidoscopy and their discomfort during the procedure, and to identify factors affecting compliance among patients scheduled for sigmoidoscopy. Design: Patient survey at the time sigmoidoscopy was ordered and again one week after the procedure was performed. Setting: An academic general internal medicine practice. Patients: 105 consecutive patients scheduled for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Main results: Seventy-five percent of patients (79/105) scheduled for sigmoidoscopy complied with the procedure. Compliance was higher among men and among patients who had family histories of colon cancer. Although many patients experienced moderate to extreme embarrassment (27%), discomfort (42%), and pain (31%), patients experienced less embarrassment (p=0.03) and pain (p=0.02) than they had expected. Patients aged 65 years and older were twice as likely as younger ones (52% versus 25%) to experience moderate to extreme pain (p=0.04). Only 1.4% of patients reported that they would probably not have the test again. Conclusion: Although flexible sigmoidoscopy is an uncomfortable procedure for some patients, especially those aged 65 and older, in general it is not as bad as patients expect and most would have the test again. Therefore, rather than assuming sigmoidoscopy is too uncomfortable for all patients to tolerate as a screening test, clinicians should inform their patients about the potential benefits and risks of sigmoidoscopy and about what the patient can expect during the procedure, thus enabling the patient to make an informed decision about whether to undergo screening sigmoidoscopy.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Participation of high-risk subjects in colon cancer screeningCancer, 1989
- The early detection of cancer in the primary-care setting: Factors associated with the acceptance and completion of recommended proceduresPreventive Medicine, 1987
- Participation in fecal occult blood screening: A critical reviewPreventive Medicine, 1987
- Maximizing Compliance With Hemoccult Screening for Colon Cancer in Clinical PracticeMedical Care, 1986
- Short (35-cm) versus long (60-cm) flexible sigmoidoscopy: a comparison of findings and tolerance in asymptomatic patients screened for colorectal neoplasiaGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1985
- The advantages of the 30-cm flexible sigmoidoscope over the 60-cm flexible sigmoidoscopeGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1984
- Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy—The monroe clinic experienceDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1983
- Superiority of the Flexible to the Rigid Sigmoidoscope in Routine ProctosigmoidoscopyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Comparison of flexible sigmoidoscopy with other diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of rectocolon neoplasiaDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1979
- Sigmoidoscopic examinations with rigid and flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopes in the surgeon's officeDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1979