Are We Doing Better with Large-Bowel Cancer?
- 22 March 1984
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 310 (12) , 782-783
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198403223101209
Abstract
AS the second leading cause of death from neoplasia, large-bowel cancer commands the attention of many kinds of physicians. Although the treatment of large-bowel cancer has historically been, and still is, surgical, today gastroenterologists, radiation therapists, medical oncologists, immunologists, family physicians, and pathologists are also committed to preventing, treating, and learning about this disease. In this issue of the Journal, the Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG)1 reports the results of a careful randomized study of patients with colon cancer. They found no benefit when patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil and semustine, nonspecific immunotherapy with the methanol . . .Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer — Results of a Prospectively Randomized TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Efficacy of prolonged intermittent therapy with combined 5-fluorouracil and methyl-ccnu following resection for carcinoma of the large bowel. A veterans administration surgical oncology group reportCancer, 1984
- Metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A prospective randomized trial of Methyl-CCNU, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and vincristine (MOF) versus MOF plus streptozotocin (MOF-strep)Cancer, 1983
- Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Cancer of the Colon and Rectum: Demonstration of Effectiveness of Prolonged 5-FU Chemotherapy in a Prospectively Controlled, Randomized TrialSurgical Clinics of North America, 1981