Is attrition bias a problem in neonatal follow-up?
- 30 November 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Early Human Development
- Vol. 81 (11) , 901-908
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.07.006
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- EDITORIAL: Nonresponse research – an underdeveloped field in epidemiologyEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Looking back in time: outcome of a national cohort of very preterm infants born in The Netherlands in 1983Early Human Development, 2000
- Outcome of very preterm birth: children reviewed with ease at 2 years differ from those followed up with difficultyArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 1998
- Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropoutsThe Lancet, 1995
- School performance at nine years of age in very premature and very low birth weight infants: Perinatal risk factors and predictors at five years of ageThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1994
- Cohort reconstruction: which infants can be restudied at school age?Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1991
- Outcome among surviving very low birthweight infants: a meta-analysis.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1991
- MORBIDITY OF VERY LOW BIRTHWEIGHT INFANTS AT CORRECTED AGE OF TWO YEARS IN A GEOGRAPHICALLY DEFINED POPULATIONThe Lancet, 1989
- Who Goes and Who StaysJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 1985
- On Intrauterine GrowthInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1970