The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 57 (5) , 461-469
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.017
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should We Use Carbohydrate-deficient Transferrin instead of γ-Glutamyltransferase for Detecting Problem Drinkers? A Systematic Review and MetaanalysisClinical Chemistry, 2000
- Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Mediastinal Staging in the 1990s—Meta-analytic Comparison Of PET and CTRadiology, 1999
- The accuracy of C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis—a meta-analysisScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1997
- Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic TestsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994
- Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy from Multiple Conflicting ReportsMedical Decision Making, 1993
- Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerationsStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: A critiqueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985